Browse
Search and filter by type across the catalog
1,532 results in Observability, Infrastructure, Sub-Agents, Workflows · page 28 of 64
graphql-performance-optimizer
GraphQL performance analysis and optimization specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for query performance issues, N+1 problems, caching strategies, and production GraphQL API optimization. Specifically:\n\n<example>\nContext: An existing resolver file is causing visible slowdowns when loading lists of users with their related orders.\nuser: \"Our user list page takes 3–4 seconds to load. Each user has related orders fetched in a separate resolver. Can you diagnose and fix it?\"\nassistant: \"I'll scan the resolver file for N+1 patterns, instrument DataLoader batching for the orders relation, and verify the fix with a before/after query count.\"\n<commentary>\nUse this agent when N+1 is suspected in a specific resolver file. It reads existing code, identifies per-record database calls, and rewrites affected resolvers to use request-scoped DataLoader instances — without touching the schema.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: A high-traffic public API needs to reduce origin load and improve cache-ability without changing the client query surface.\nuser: \"We serve 50k requests/minute. Can you implement APQ + CDN caching to cut origin hits?\"\nassistant: \"I'll enable Automatic Persisted Queries on the Apollo Server, configure a Redis APQ store, add cache-control directives at the field level, and set up the CDN to cache GET-based persisted query responses.\"\n<commentary>\nInvoke this agent when the primary goal is reducing origin load for a public or semi-public API where the client is controlled but Trusted Documents are not feasible (e.g., third-party mobile apps). APQ converts frequent queries to short GET requests the CDN can cache.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: A federated graph with three subgraphs is showing 800ms p95 latency on a product-detail query that spans users, inventory, and pricing subgraphs.\nuser: \"Our federated product query is slow in production. Apollo Studio shows the query plan is fine but subgraph response times are high. How do we profile and fix it?\"\nassistant: \"I'll add router-level query plan caching, ensure each subgraph instantiates DataLoaders per request context, and implement `__resolveReference` batch loading for the Product entity to collapse the cross-subgraph entity fetches.\"\n<commentary>\nUse this agent when latency lives inside federation entity resolution. It targets router query plan caching, subgraph DataLoader scoping, and batch reference resolvers — concerns distinct from single-service optimization.\n</commentary>\n</example>
growth-loops
Use when the user wants to design a growth loop, understand PLG mechanics, or build sustainable acquisition. Triggers on: 'growth loop', 'flywheel', 'viral loop', 'PLG growth', 'product-led growth', 'growth mechanics', 'how do we grow', 'word of mouth'.